3 ms·
If the criticism is valid then its source is surely irrelevant. The calling it throwaway was a mistake of mine, I should have called it Anon or similar because
by throwaway_pdp09 6y ago
If the criticism is valid then its source is surely irrelevant.
The calling it throwaway was a mistake of mine, I should have called it Anon or similar because anonymity not disposability was its purpose.
- Chris2048 6y agoSure, but what I'm saying is that unnecessary throwaway-posting could be viewed as a greater violation, as it shields you from downvotes. If anyone disagrees that the criticism is valid, they cannot effectively downvote you. To put it another way, If the arrest is valid then who cares if I'm not a real cop?
- throwaway_pdp09 6y agoAs I carefully explained, account is throwaway in name not intent. If you look at my profile it's over a year old. > If the arrest is valid then who cares if I'm not a real cop? In the uk, no-one. We have citizens' arrest. It appears the US has similar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest#United_States
- Chris2048 6y agoImpersonating a police officer is still illegal in the UK, the point is: the ends don't justify the means. My response was to the comment: > If the criticism is valid then its source is surely irrelevant. If the account was a throwaway, the source would have mattered. I think it's worth making this counterpoint irrespective of whether your account is a throwaway, since you made an argument that would seem to defend that case.