4 ms·
I think it'll be similar to the situation with pictures. We've had the ability to 'photoshop' people's faces in and out of images for a long time now. I think
by optymizer 6y ago
I think it'll be similar to the situation with pictures. We've had the ability to 'photoshop' people's faces in and out of images for a long time now.
I think the first question asked of a video is going to be "is this a deep fake?" just like we currently ask "is this picture photoshopped?".
It doesn't mean that we no longer use pictures, or that we don't alter pictures, just that we are more critical of them.
That said, there is just more realism in a series of moving pictures, but I don't see why the situation for a series of fake pictures has to be wildly different from the situation of a single fake picture.
- sandworm101 6y agoThe issue is cost. Proving that an image is or isn't photoshopped isn't all that difficult/expensive. Anyone well versed in digital imagery can use basic tools to expose 99.99% of photoshopped images. But moving pictures are different. Due to compression artifacts and the overall lower quality of each frame there is much more room for opinion. An answer one way or another may be possible but it will be a much greater and more expensive battle of experts.
- Tenoke 6y agoIf anything it's the opposite and it's much harder to fake videos without leaving traces.
- evan_ 6y agoIn just the last couple hours someone has tweeted a picture of Biden from June 2019 not wearing a facemask, and claiming it's from more recently and he's being irresponsible by not wearing a facemask. It has tens of thousands of retweets, no deep fake necessary.