5 ms·
Meet seems to work better on poor connections, but it does it with a significantly more CPU intensive codec (VP9?). As a result, it only seems to work well if y
by loosescrews 6y ago
Meet seems to work better on poor connections, but it does it with a significantly more CPU intensive codec (VP9?). As a result, it only seems to work well if you have a powerful CPU. If you have a weak CPU, Zoom seems to work much better.
- jvdvegt 6y agoOn my 2010 Macbook Pro, Meet uses about half the CPU resources as Zoom. Also, audio-lag is much worse in Zoom. Background blur doesn't seem available in Firefox on Ubuntu unfortunately :(
- MarkyC4 6y agonot just Ubuntu, Firefox 82.0.2 on Mac doesn't show the option
- tssva 6y agoMy only experience with Meet on a weak CPU is my daughter using it for remote learning on her school supplied Chromebook which uses a Mediatek processor from 2015 which has 2 A-53 and 2 A-72 cores. Meet performs fine on the platform.