4 ms·

That's the most flimsy argumentation... Anyone could say so is yours. Like I said to the author, step back and view it from someone else's eyes. But if you do

That's the most flimsy argumentation... Anyone could say so is yours. Like I said to the author, step back and view it from someone else's eyes. But if you don't want to try, your loss.

rndgermandude 6y ago
That doesn't mean anything. And I didn't even put forth an argument of whether I consider the author left, right, center, whatever. I poked and prodded your argument, because I found it to be extremely unsound (excluding the censorship discussion). And frankly I fail to find any set of eyes I'd be comfortable with where I could follow your argument for the author being a Russian-bot supporting right wing Qanon based on what he wrote. Just too unsound and lacking any assumption of good faith on the authors part, casting him as what is - in these parts of the internet - almost (right wing) or defacto slurs (russian bot; Qanon). Again, as for seeing with somebody else's eyes... well, I did for the censorship argument, didn't dismiss what you said outright (sorry if that wasn't clear enough) but put forth my own argument, that in part even agrees with what you said yourself.