> I don't think you've adequately proven your point. It's not exactly controversial, so what else needs to be proven? You asked why things are as they are, I

> I don't think you've adequately proven your point. It's not exactly controversial, so what else needs to be proven? You asked why things are as they are, I say it's because we implemented rules governing how we drive and walk on roads to create predictability and therefore safety. Don't like that cars seem to have more free reign? Change the road design, change the rules. But there are good reasons we have the system we have now.