7 ms·
> That's true, but the more overt way would be seizure of the equipment, imprisonment, or worse. And for some people for some causes those risks, including "wo
by nullc 6y ago
> That's true, but the more overt way would be seizure of the equipment, imprisonment, or worse.
And for some people for some causes those risks, including "worse", might be worth it.
Besides, if you're the sort of person who might be the target of "worse" you're probably going to have a hard time regardless of if the oppressive power gets into your device. ... but maybe the security protects some of your friends from befalling the same fate.
As far as seizure goes-- it has an accelerometer in it: "Zeroize on throw" is probably implementable. Alternatively, time-lock where if the device is moved from its hiding spot at the wrong time of day or without the right gestures it get wiped.