3 ms·
http://astrobiology.com/2020/10/no-phosphine-in-the-atmosphere-of-venus.html http://astrobiology.com/2020/10/no-phosphine-in-the-atmosphe... No, we need to con
by hindsightbias 6y ago
http://astrobiology.com/2020/10/no-phosphine-in-the-atmosphere-of-venus.html http://astrobiology.com/2020/10/no-phosphine-in-the-atmosphe...
No, we need to confirm basic science first before doing anything as soon as possible.
- gus_massa 6y agoI was more convinced that the original paper may have problems by https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09761 https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09761 From that preprint: > We find that the 12th-order polynomial fit to the spectral passband utilised in the published study leads to spurious results. Using a 12th-order polynomial fit is very suspicious? And I think that it is very interesting to see Figure 2, top-left. The signal is very noisy and the polynomial fit is not convincing. That graph is a very big red flag.
- kanox 6y agoSomething is terribly wrong if astronomy of all fields encountered a reproducibility crisis.