3 ms·
It's because UX is increasingly becoming standardized, starting to resemble a "solved problem" in some parts. It's like website design. Far fewer jobs availabl
by AuthorizedCust 6y ago
It's because UX is increasingly becoming standardized, starting to resemble a "solved problem" in some parts.
It's like website design. Far fewer jobs available in that field because so many now just use lightly configured, pre-built themes. Website designs, in other words, are standardized far more than ever.
Yes, there are exceptions, as others here describe, but they don't negate a clear trend.
- swiley 6y agoIn consumer software? No. UX has regressed and most software is now written by employees who don't have much of a say or have given up. remember that function is only important in closed software insofar as it keeps people from moving to something else. If the cost of the move is higher than the cost of bad UX there's no buisness incentive to fix it.
- superhuzza 6y ago>starting to resemble a "solved problem" Not at all, the field is exploding, and people's expectations are constantly evolving. Because UX is fundamentally about people, there will never be a final 'end state'. It's a bit like saying software is a "solved problem" - in reality, the needs of businesses and people will always change.