4 ms·
It often is, but sometimes those rights are only imagined rights. Does a right extremist have a right to have his race free from other races? You say yourself
by legulere 6y ago
It often is, but sometimes those rights are only imagined rights. Does a right extremist have a right to have his race free from other races?
You say yourself that rights are sometimes at conflict with each other. That requires that sometimes rights are restricted to a point that other rights are not infringed. For instance we lock up dangerous people. Why do you think is freedom of speech is some kind of super-right that triumphs over every other right? Is freedom of speech more important even when it’s used to incite genocide?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- tom-_- 6y agoTherein lies the subjectivity. One person interprets neo Nazis rallies as inciting genocide. Another interprets it as a bunch of harmless nuts on parade.
- kls 6y agoNot to mention the act of genocide is the issue at hand. We keep talking Nazi's but there are people from all walks of life and races that would like to eliminate races unlike them. If they never put those thought into action they are harmless and those that advocate free speech are believers in intellect and rationalism as the winner of the day over ignorant thinking such as this, as it cannot be eliminated, and to completely eliminated it would necessitate genocide, the logic has a circularity to it. The issue at hand is some people want instant results where tolerance is a long game, that does not give them their click and get it now satisfaction.