5 ms·
You wouldn't say that is the camera was assisting with a serious surgery or firing a military rocket, it's not okay, we need to make sure the bar is set very hi
by suyash 6y ago
You wouldn't say that is the camera was assisting with a serious surgery or firing a military rocket, it's not okay, we need to make sure the bar is set very high and there needs to be penalties/ fines for mistakes if we are going to jump on the fully autonomous bandwagon.
- tdeck 6y agoThose applications already have higher standards for general software reliability, to say nothing of AI. Obviously the bar is different for different applications.
- bobthepanda 6y agoThat sounds wildly out of proportion for a soccer match where you can just recheck the footage
- cmroanirgo 6y agoConsidering that at least a cameraman has lost his job recently, there's always going to be a social cost to moving to pure tech. It's never just one thing (ie. It's not just a soccer match)
- ARandomerDude 6y agoNo rockets, no surgery here. Just a game. It's probably ok to lower the budget by an order of magnitude and open a ticket in Jira after the match.
- jader201 6y ago> You wouldn't say that is the camera was assisting with a serious surgery or firing a military rocket No you wouldn’t. But it’s not. “Move fast, break things” is perfectly ok for certain applications, such as recreational AI. Nobody said it’s ok for medical or military applications. You can live in a world where the bar for quality control varies depending on the application. Experimentation will never happen if we set medical/military grade expectations across the board.