3 ms·
Backus: Well, because the fundamental paradigm did not include a way of dealing with real time. It was a way of saying how to transform this thing into that thi
by discreteevent 6y ago
Backus: Well, because the fundamental paradigm did not include a way of dealing with real time. It was a way of saying how to transform this thing into that thing, but there was no element of time involved, and that was where it got hung up.
Booch: That’s a problem you wrestled with for literally years.
Backus: Yeah, and unsuccessfully.
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2013/05/102657970-05-01-acc.pdf http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/201...
- carapace 6y agoVery interesting, cheers! Functional Reactive Programming seems promising. (Elm ditched it in favor of some simpler metaphor on didactic rather than technical grounds, I think.)