Can they even pull the AGPL license? The re-licensing of current/new code is one thing, but removing the license on the old code? How is that possible? What abo

Can they even pull the AGPL license? The re-licensing of current/new code is one thing, but removing the license on the old code? How is that possible? What about copies elsewhere, are those no longer validly licensed? That's not how I thought licenses work. These guys just appear to go from bad to worse, ignorantly making shit up as they go (on a road to certain self-destruction, if you'd ask me). Also, why don't I hear more people about how GitHub was used to not at all host any code, but instead only as a (marketing) referral point for proprietary stuff somewhere else? I said goodbye to GitHub a while ago, so I wasn't aware this this had become acceptable practice. Anyways, if this was a court case .. this would probably be the point where a judge would look these fellows straight in the eyes and say something along the lines of: "With arrogant behavior you so clearly displayed, you yourselves have squandered any of the sympathy, lenience, and benefit of a doubt I usually give to defendants, and will hereby sentence you to the harshest possible punishment. Not only to give a clear indication that your behavior is in no way acceptable. But also to serve as a reminder for any future parasites, whenever they think of making up their own rules as they see fit". Either way, I think this shit is going to haunt these guys. Unless I got it all completely wrong, probably well deserved too.