4 ms·
I am surprisingly incensed by my interpretation of your questions as being cavalier and disingenuous. As far as I can tell, you mean to dismiss by misdirection
by esoterae 6y ago
I am surprisingly incensed by my interpretation of your questions as being cavalier and disingenuous. As far as I can tell, you mean to dismiss by misdirection or fallacy. I suggest you've got the wrong end of the stick, and leave it at that.
Up until 30 minutes ago, I was an octotree customer. Do I have standing? Do I need someone's permission to care about this? I'm not a concerned contributor; I'm a former supporter now concerned with what my subscription has enabled. I cannot address the money that is already under the bridge, but I can certainly stop dropping it in the river.
I'm not upset about the question re: AGPL inclusion, I'm upset about the very, very poor series of answers and actions by the maintainer, whatever form they've individually taken.
Should the whole mess of a posteri license reassignment get addressed cogently and comprehensively, I'll reconsider. Even a mea culpa would be sufficient, should it be followed by Doing The Right Thing[s].
- cortesoft 6y ago> Up until 30 minutes ago, I was an octotree customer. Do I have standing? No, you don’t. Only people who wrote any of the code would have standing.
- dataflow 6y ago> I am surprisingly incensed by my interpretation of your questions as being cavalier and disingenuous. As far as I can tell, you mean to dismiss by misdirection or fallacy. No, and I'd reply to your points, but I'm quite offended by your comment (and you're breaking the site rules).
- jlgaddis 6y agoSeriously? You're "offended" by that!? Geez.