Annoying is the wrong word - had HN had the feature to edit/update I would :) I do think the person who takes the title of CEO is risking more, and than deserv

Annoying is the wrong word - had HN had the feature to edit/update I would :) I do think the person who takes the title of CEO is risking more, and than deserves credit. They have their name in the public, and reputation on the line more than anyone else in the company (and, ideally should be up at 3 am as well, either fixing servers, or cold-emailing PR firms, or working on investment decks, blah blah blah). Greater risk deserves greater upside - while it's just a rule of thumb, I think Dan's post is a good starting point for the conversation on how to recognize that.