3 ms·
This argument is silly since it assumes that self driving is somehow both the fastest and most efficient way to save people's lives, however we have working tec
by 3vidence 6y ago
This argument is silly since it assumes that self driving is somehow both the fastest and most efficient way to save people's lives, however we have working technologies we could implement today that could save lives (breathalyzers for cars, measures of visibility plus warnings, etc). Self driving efforts related to saving lives miss the opportunity costs of doing so.
- criddell 6y agoThere's no reason both paths couldn't be pursued.