> Nuclear is orders of magnitude better than other low-co2 options. Then, why is it not economically viable when fairly competing with solar and wind energy? B

> Nuclear is orders of magnitude better than other low-co2 options. Then, why is it not economically viable when fairly competing with solar and wind energy? Because it requires much more subsidies and nuclear developers cannot even bear the financial risks of their projects, as one would expect from a economically viable technology.