"narrowed down to what you first discussed with Betsy" My post addresses this at the start, which is why I construed the analogy as such to reflect the editor'

"narrowed down to what you first discussed with Betsy" My post addresses this at the start, which is why I construed the analogy as such to reflect the editor's requests. Greenwald's article is fine. But I don't think the editorial followups are unprecedented or objectionable from the perspective of your typical run of the mill engineering practices. If Greenwald is uncomfortable with collaborating with editors, he may return to his life as an independent journalist, as he has done so.