3 ms·
In my opinion [0] Agile improves time to market (latency) at the cost of process efficiency (throughput). If you adopt Scrum to improve efficiency (maybe callin
by qznc 6y ago
In my opinion [0] Agile improves time to market (latency) at the cost of process efficiency (throughput). If you adopt Scrum to improve efficiency (maybe calling it velocity), then you are using the wrong approach. It will certainly not improve efficiency. Worse, by pushing Scrum to improve efficiency, Scrum loses all its advantages. This leads to the common result nothing changes.
[0] http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/cost_of_agile.html http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/cost_of_agile.html
- Spearchucker 6y agoWhy value efficiency and not quality? Remeber Deming (1)? Result of work effort quality = ----------------------- Total cost When focus is on quality, quality rises and costs fall. When focus is cost, costs rise and quality falls. (1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming