2 ms·
I'm not disagreeing that the real numbers have no physical basis; that would be silly. I'm disagreeing with the absurd claim that "uncomputable numbers … in the
by creata 6y ago
I'm not disagreeing that the real numbers have no physical basis; that would be silly. I'm disagreeing with the absurd claim that "uncomputable numbers … in the guise of string theory obtained a death grip on fundamental physics". The real numbers are used in every single part of physics, and physicists do not care to distinguish between computable and non-computable reals, because that makes the theory much more complex with no known practical benefit.
I also wish that the person I initially replied to would expand on their vague claim that
> Fortunately a new generation of smart people, with intuitions honed on computers, is well placed to capitalize on this arbitrage opportunity.