4 ms·
> Like one cohort starting at 8 and another starting at 10 or even 11. What about at 14 or something? 10 or 11 for me is still very inconveniently early. BTW
by grishka 6y ago
> Like one cohort starting at 8 and another starting at 10 or even 11.
What about at 14 or something? 10 or 11 for me is still very inconveniently early.
BTW where I'm from, schools usually start at 9:00. It was a torture for me to get up this early, and I was drowsy for the first couple classes.
- Macha 6y agoYeah, in secondary (high) school it was not uncommon for me to basically nap the first class or two. Luckily I got pretty good grades and was capable of self study to keep ahead of the content and no subject was consistently a morning class, so I had no worse consequences than a teacher asking my parents if I was doing OK at home.
- ascar 6y agoI mentioned 10 or 11, because I believe a shift of a couple of hours (by 1 or 2 classes) already brings a tremendous benefit for many students, while having only a small impact on the schools organization and other social activites of students (like late afternoon club activities). So while not ideal, I think the change is actually easily implementable without too many negative consequences. Personally, I would be even more productive in an afternoon only school. I did work for a while from 1pm to 8pm and I really enjoyed how rested I was, but this schedule definitely limits available club activites.
- koffiezet 6y agoI currently start my working day at 10, but I'd prefer it a bit later. I notice I start getting really productive around 16-17 - when all the early birds stop working (which also means less interruptions and meetings) My natural sleeping rhythm always seem to drift towards 3-4 -> 12 in weekends or when I take a few days off.