3 ms·
At this point the state might as well just take over the company as it sounds like they have essentially done so through regulation anyway.
by SOLAR_FIELDS 6y ago
At this point the state might as well just take over the company as it sounds like they have essentially done so through regulation anyway.
- lotsofpulp 6y agoBut then there won’t be a fall guy when things go wrong.
- thaumasiotes 6y agoWell, yes, that would make more sense. I assume the idea behind the current setup is that having the state own a power company would be "communist", whereas having a "private" power company for which the state determines the areas it serves, the rates it charges customers, and how it spends its money is "not communist".
- fastball 6y agoNever attribute to anti-communism that which can be more easily explained by crony capitalism.