4 ms·
A year or two ago I built a machine with a 9600k (yet another 14nm++++++ cpu), thinking I'd upgrade to Zen 3 or Rocket Lake later on. Now that later on has arri
by gautamcgoel 6y ago
A year or two ago I built a machine with a 9600k (yet another 14nm++++++ cpu), thinking I'd upgrade to Zen 3 or Rocket Lake later on. Now that later on has arrived, I see little reason to upgrade: I use my machine mainly for browsing the web, watching Netflix, and occasionally running scripts in Python/R/Matlab, etc. Most of these tasks would not run noticably faster on a beefier cpu; those that would are not really slowing down my overall productivity. Of course, this only describes my personal situation, but I do wonder if we have past the point where hardware upgrades matter for 95% of the population. Except for really hard-core gamers who really demand the best and people who do a lot of video processing/ML/scientific computing, I doubt most people would really benefit from switching from a last generation cpu to a newer one. I'm happy to wait another ten years to upgrade.
- throwbackThurs 6y agoRecently I purchased a fully upgraded 2015 mbp retina 13" which has a 2.9GHz Broadwell and a 512GB SSD in it. It's definitely not the fastest but considering I only paid 450€ for it and this is a computer that was probably worth around 2000€ when it came out, I think it's a really good purchase. The notion that we "need" the latest hardware is propaganda, unless of course you are rendering 4K videos or molecular dynamics simulations. Mostly I think people are just bored, or their companies provide them with the latest and greatest