From the article: > Rather than accepting the bad bargain Proposition 22 presents, voters should demand a better, broader answer from Sacramento. IMO, while t

From the article: > Rather than accepting the bad bargain Proposition 22 presents, voters should demand a better, broader answer from Sacramento. IMO, while that's in principle a decent idea, that's not really a great alternative practically speaking. We're supposed to just hope something different happens in the legislature, and in the mean time, we'll see diminished service and many drivers will be out of work / lose the flexibility of setting their own hours?