11 ms·

OpenAI use well-know linguistics tricks relying on conjunctions(joining words) to separate the text from which they plagiarize on clusters from 5-7 words, exact

OpenAI use well-know linguistics tricks relying on conjunctions(joining words) to separate the text from which they plagiarize on clusters from 5-7 words, exactly the capacity of human short-term memory is. They also use the Google search engine for custom queries, with date restriction which helps them to plagiarize from different texts written on a particular topic so they to be sure that when they copy, paste and concatenate clusters of words in new text, all these phrases of 5-7 words should be related to one topic. This creates the illusion of meaningfulness at first glance. GPT-3 on Progress. “Civilization rose on the exponential curve. We shouldn’t expect progress to follow a straight line.” Google with date restriction before 1 April 2020: "progress to follow a straight line". Do you see only one result that come :-) https://chrismukiibi.com/2019/11/26/the-valley-of-disappoint https://chrismukiibi.com/2019/11/26/the-valley-of-disappoint... "We shouldn’t expect progress to follow a straight line." and "we expect our progress to follow a straight line" Do you understand now, how they use conjunctions(joining words) to insert or to delete insignificant words as "shouldn't" and "our" to plagiarize so that they are not caught.

emilenchev 6y ago
Now make Google Search again with date restriction before 1 April 2020. "After two days of intense debate" "the United Methodist Church has agreed to" "one that is expected to end" "in the creation of a new denomination" You will find and sources of GPT-3 text: After two days of intense debate, the United Methodist Church has agreed to a historic split – one that is expected to end in the creation of a new denomination, one that will be “theologically and socially conservative,” according to The Washington Post. The majority of delegates attending the church’s annual General Conference in May voted to strengthen a ban on the ordination of LGBTQ clergy and to write new rules that will “discipline” clergy who officiate at same-sex weddings. But those who opposed these measures have a new plan: They say they will form a separate denomination by 2020, calling their church the Christian Methodist denomination. The Post notes that the denomination, which claims 12.5 million members, was in the early 20th century the “largest Protestant denomination in the U.S.,” but that it has been shrinking in recent decades. The new split will be the second in the church’s history. The first occurred in 1968, when roughly 10 percent of the denomination left to form the Evangelical United Brethren Church. The Post notes that the proposed split “comes at a critical time for the church, which has been losing members for years,” which has been “pushed toward the brink of a schism over the role of LGBTQ people in the church.” Gay marriage is not the only issue that has divided the church. In 2016, the denomination was split over ordination of transgender clergy, with the North Pacific regional conference voting to ban them from serving as clergy, and the South Pacific regional conference voting to allow them.
- emilenchev 6y ago
  "GPT-3 is a language model, which means that you feed it a text and ask it to predict the continuation of the text, one word at a time." So Yann LeCun is not right about GPT-3 here. They don't try to predict anything - especially "one word at time". They simply plagiarize big clusters from 5-7 words or whole sentence and do cosmetic modifications to them to be not recognized by direct searching with Google. When you plagiarize such big clusters written by humans it is normal output compile result of GPT-3 text to have human like look for readers. And they don't use statistic for nothing else except the plagiarism process itself. It will be strange ML algorithm to use phrases with low statistical value as "in the creation of a new denomination" or "progress to follow a straight line". ;-) When you can't emulate human brain processes you can always simulate human plagiarize traits. Especially when there are so many idiots who believe on closed open source code and don't ask elementary questions as "Why someone project suddenly will start to show such "astonishing" results exactly when he close the code behind it?"
  - emilenchev 6y ago
    You can ask Facebook how they stick their noses in their users computers, and who is the real person behind this work: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-goes-bilingual-without-dictionary https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/11/artificial-intellige... Or how they still owe me a bug bounty reward from 2017 for bug in their login form that permit to reap their whole users phones database - and I as last fool give it to them in official channels without to exploit it. For "tanks" they hack my pc and steal my intellectual property you see above. Next year 2018 2 weaks before big hack I warned them that I founded "new" bug but this time they first must pay me bug bounty reward for this in 2017, and next I will give them new one. THEY Refuse to pay me AGAIN. The rest is history... I waited FBI to arest me - they don't want to do i even I never hide my identity. Because they must confess they hack my pc, they owe me a money AND THEY DON'T CARE ABOUTSECURITY OF THEIR USERS. I very like how I faced them :---
    - emilenchev 6y ago
      Facebook - emilenchev1978@yahoo.com :-) $1,000,000 now or $100,000,000 after several months - your choice. I give you choice and back in 2018, remember? You make one, the wrong. Now to understand if you become smarter for these 2 years. As I see you don't make many progress from my intellectual property yet. This time you will have opportunity to look in a future again but not from my PC, more like in arXiv.org. And ohh, believe me I will start to talk about our relationship in the past if you don't pay me these $100M. And don't worry I think about how it will, happens. You will buy my dummy high tech company for $100,000,000 without any know-how in it ;-) because I'm sure that you are dumb enough to not pay me $1M now. You will see.

emilenchev 6y ago

Now make Google Search again with date restriction before 1 April 2020. "After two days of intense debate" "the United Methodist Church has agreed to" "one that is expected to end" "in the creation of a new denomination" You will find and sources of GPT-3 text: After two days of intense debate, the United Methodist Church has agreed to a historic split – one that is expected to end in the creation of a new denomination, one that will be “theologically and socially conservative,” according to The Washington Post. The majority of delegates attending the church’s annual General Conference in May voted to strengthen a ban on the ordination of LGBTQ clergy and to write new rules that will “discipline” clergy who officiate at same-sex weddings. But those who opposed these measures have a new plan: They say they will form a separate denomination by 2020, calling their church the Christian Methodist denomination. The Post notes that the denomination, which claims 12.5 million members, was in the early 20th century the “largest Protestant denomination in the U.S.,” but that it has been shrinking in recent decades. The new split will be the second in the church’s history. The first occurred in 1968, when roughly 10 percent of the denomination left to form the Evangelical United Brethren Church. The Post notes that the proposed split “comes at a critical time for the church, which has been losing members for years,” which has been “pushed toward the brink of a schism over the role of LGBTQ people in the church.” Gay marriage is not the only issue that has divided the church. In 2016, the denomination was split over ordination of transgender clergy, with the North Pacific regional conference voting to ban them from serving as clergy, and the South Pacific regional conference voting to allow them.

emilenchev 6y ago
"GPT-3 is a language model, which means that you feed it a text and ask it to predict the continuation of the text, one word at a time." So Yann LeCun is not right about GPT-3 here. They don't try to predict anything - especially "one word at time". They simply plagiarize big clusters from 5-7 words or whole sentence and do cosmetic modifications to them to be not recognized by direct searching with Google. When you plagiarize such big clusters written by humans it is normal output compile result of GPT-3 text to have human like look for readers. And they don't use statistic for nothing else except the plagiarism process itself. It will be strange ML algorithm to use phrases with low statistical value as "in the creation of a new denomination" or "progress to follow a straight line". ;-) When you can't emulate human brain processes you can always simulate human plagiarize traits. Especially when there are so many idiots who believe on closed open source code and don't ask elementary questions as "Why someone project suddenly will start to show such "astonishing" results exactly when he close the code behind it?"
- emilenchev 6y ago
  You can ask Facebook how they stick their noses in their users computers, and who is the real person behind this work: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-goes-bilingual-without-dictionary https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/11/artificial-intellige... Or how they still owe me a bug bounty reward from 2017 for bug in their login form that permit to reap their whole users phones database - and I as last fool give it to them in official channels without to exploit it. For "tanks" they hack my pc and steal my intellectual property you see above. Next year 2018 2 weaks before big hack I warned them that I founded "new" bug but this time they first must pay me bug bounty reward for this in 2017, and next I will give them new one. THEY Refuse to pay me AGAIN. The rest is history... I waited FBI to arest me - they don't want to do i even I never hide my identity. Because they must confess they hack my pc, they owe me a money AND THEY DON'T CARE ABOUTSECURITY OF THEIR USERS. I very like how I faced them :---
  - emilenchev 6y ago
    Facebook - emilenchev1978@yahoo.com :-) $1,000,000 now or $100,000,000 after several months - your choice. I give you choice and back in 2018, remember? You make one, the wrong. Now to understand if you become smarter for these 2 years. As I see you don't make many progress from my intellectual property yet. This time you will have opportunity to look in a future again but not from my PC, more like in arXiv.org. And ohh, believe me I will start to talk about our relationship in the past if you don't pay me these $100M. And don't worry I think about how it will, happens. You will buy my dummy high tech company for $100,000,000 without any know-how in it ;-) because I'm sure that you are dumb enough to not pay me $1M now. You will see.