>But the question is what are we optimizing for? The fewest crashes? That's probably the right thing to do given crashes are bad Another thing to take into acc

>But the question is what are we optimizing for? The fewest crashes? That's probably the right thing to do given crashes are bad Another thing to take into account is that not all crashes are equally bad. I wouldn't be surprised if getting rear ended 10 times was safer than a single t-bone or head on collision