That's a good point. It still suggests there is no apples to apples comparison between the real world and simulation though, and that those numbers can't reall

That's a good point. It still suggests there is no apples to apples comparison between the real world and simulation though, and that those numbers can't really be considered equivalent or even compared in a useful way. If you're saying the simulation should've revealed more problems than the real world, wouldn't that mean there'd be more contacts through simulation (because that's where you discover them) and then you'd hope the fix exists before rolling it out to the real world, so you'd expect to have less contacts there? What they're reporting is the opposite of that though. Obviously I don't have enough information to draw a scientific conclusion here - I'm just pointing out there is an enormous discrepancy between their simulated miles and their real miles.