5 ms·
False, they are being introduced into forests in the northern half of the state but are not being introduced into the forests in the southern half of the state.
by yupyup54133 6y ago
False, they are being introduced into forests in the northern half of the state but are not being introduced into the forests in the southern half of the state. Also, when wolves are found close to the suburbs they are relocated to the north.
This is a class issue because most of the state's wealth is located in the southern half of the state and it is mostly the southern half of the state that is forcing an unwanted wolf population on the northern half of the state.
- question000 6y agoIt's just weird how Republicans find the dumbest shit to feel oppressed over, this and motorcycle helmets... Oops I said Republicans I mean conservative marginalized people!
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ip26 6y agoAre they actually being human-introduced, or are they migrating south from Canada? It's not exactly shocking that migrating wolves would appear in the northern half first. Google seems to indicate they are simply migrating.
- undersuit 6y agoThey are not being "introduced". The natural wolf populations in areas surrounding the northern wilderness of WI spread into open territory. The packs in WI are only in forested areas in the north naturally. For the wolves to reach southern wilderness they need to pass through the heavily civilized river basins into new mountainous territory, then that isolated population needs to expand on it's own, because they are not being introduced. You're right about relocations though, it's a class issue. The wolves that predate on livestock are often relocated. Normal wolf sightings though can be reported to the state to increase their coverage: https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/WildlifeHabitat/MammalObsForm.asp https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/WildlifeHabitat/MammalObsForm.asp