4 ms·
No one is perfect, so it's about how you handle your mistakes. Was there anything specific that discredits Taibbi and Greenwald as trustworthy reporters? EDIT:
by bigdict 6y ago
No one is perfect, so it's about how you handle your mistakes. Was there anything specific that discredits Taibbi and Greenwald as trustworthy reporters?
EDIT: Greenwald not Gellman
- tptacek 6y agoThe problem here is that both Greenwald and Taibbi are most notable --- by their fans! --- for those respective beats.
- bigdict 6y agoYou keep restating your thesis without giving any evidence.
- tptacek 6y agoI offered (and was subsequently asked) to explain the basis for my comment upthread about those two deserving each other. I didn't offer and am not interested in being cross-examined. I've written in detail about both Taibbi and Greenwald on this site, so if you're interested in details, avail thyself of the search bar beloweth.
- bigdict 6y agoI was hoping you would support the argument you are making on this topic in this conversation. I have no interest in wading through your old comments, especially if they are as handwavy as the new ones.