> Or do you think it is the awkward ones who are sitting on the CoC tribunal? Would it be fair to say that you believe the majority of CoC reports are due to a

> Or do you think it is the awkward ones who are sitting on the CoC tribunal? Would it be fair to say that you believe the majority of CoC reports are due to a misunderstanding of a well-intentioned behavior on the part of an awkward individual? If so, where does this idea come from? > It is absolutely worth considering such things, which is why we (at least were I live) have laws against such things, and also why I am in favour of those laws. To pursue something legally requires a formal legal process, evidence, lawyers, etc., and has strict penal consequences. Would you consider there is a need for a more informal process where the consequences is being kicked out of an event? > I'm absolutely fine with women feeling safe. But you aren't fine with an organization creating rules to help women feel safe. Why is it an abuse of power, acting as "judge, jury and executioner," to remove someone from an event or organization who causes women to feel uncomfortable?