4 ms·
If the best you can do is call him names, just don't weigh in. The article may be a form of a rant, but it is meant as a opinion, and an articulate and specifi
by sam_goody 6y ago
If the best you can do is call him names, just don't weigh in.
The article may be a form of a rant, but it is meant as a opinion, and an articulate and specific opinion at that. Everything he says is either very believable, obvious, or verifiable. You may not like what he is preaching, but give examples of what is incorrect, and why, or just go home.
Generally, labeling ("screed from an unhinged man"), hyperbole ("as much as I could get through"), unjustified claims ("pushing the boundaries more and more") and projections ("it's not surprising") are all great in debate class, and do wonders in a courtroom (unfortunately), but they are not content, they are tools of persuasion.
- noelsusman 6y ago>The article may be a form of a rant, but it is meant as a opinion That's the whole problem. Greenwald doesn't call himself a columnist, he calls himself a journalist. The Intercept doesn't publish his articles as opinion pieces, they publish them as news. You can't publish that article as a news piece with any sort of credibility.