3 ms·

My recollection (which could be completely wrong) was that they had a branch with it, but it really needed hardware transactional memory to memory to have decen

by danmur 6y ago

My recollection (which could be completely wrong) was that they had a branch with it, but it really needed hardware transactional memory to memory to have decent speed for most applications.

pansa2 6y ago
Makes sense - they seem to have stopped work on STM so presumably it couldn’t be made to work well. How will STM in Ruby solve (or avoid) the problems that doomed STM in Python?