I think with this The Intercept has lost all its credibility as the outlet that will publish stories others will not. It's clear that Hunter Biden's data was c

I think with this The Intercept has lost all its credibility as the outlet that will publish stories others will not. It's clear that Hunter Biden's data was compromised. The data that I have seen is definitely real and definitely his. The provenance of this data is unclear. It's also a common technique to compromise data and doctor a couple of documents to slip in among-st the real ones. My opinion is that it's some kind of a cloud service hack given the type of information that was compromised (video, photos, sms logs, emails.) I have seen scant little coverage of this in the mainstream, or even alternative, media. Why can't they address what is verifiable in this story and add a codicil that some of it may be false?