> If you have resources to support the third child, and you chose to not spend them on the child, you should feel some guilt for slowing down the progress of hu

> If you have resources to support the third child, and you chose to not spend them on the child, you should feel some guilt for slowing down the progress of humanity. Perhaps concentrating attention on two children makes it that much more likely that they will have longer, fulfilling lives, and grace us with their eventual wisdom, rather than all three grubbing in the rubble of a collapsed civilization. Sure, the odds of either path don't change much based on the single decision of whether to have another child, but every little bit helps, right?