4 ms·
> Good. No, not good. Just because it will make people take climate change seriously, this is not, by any measure, good. It's a dangerous and irreversible cha
by BelleOfTheBall 6y ago
> Good.
No, not good.
Just because it will make people take climate change seriously, this is not, by any measure, good. It's a dangerous and irreversible change and if most people want to deny climate change or downplay it, it shouldn't take a catastrophe to change their minds. The data is there, just because people find the prospect of awful things happening in 2030 not scary enough, doesn't mean we should be happy these things will happen sooner. COVID probably changed a lot of people's minds on healthcare and politics. Would we classify that as 'good' as well?
- CivBase 6y agoYou assume that making less conservative, more alarming predictions will stop the bad things from happening as soon. But how do you enact change at a national level when the voting population doesn't trust you? And why do you think I'd be happy if bad things happen sooner?