4 ms·

You clearly know how easy it is to take someone's words out of context and twist them into something they aren't. A good editor brings clarity and brevity. Th

You clearly know how easy it is to take someone's words out of context and twist them into something they aren't. A good editor brings clarity and brevity. The editor was telling Greenwald to focus on the story he could prove and tell effectively. That's not "censorship", that's good writing advice. He wanted to propagate flimsy partisan conspiracies instead. If he wants to do that in his own name, that's fine. But he is not entitled to put the Intercept's reputation behind it.

cambalache 6y ago
The editor was trying to stop Greenwald to publish a story that puts in bad light the candidate preferred by mainstream media. All the rest, in those emails and here is mental masturbation, which serves to prove that even smart people decide first and find the justification later. There is nothing noble or ethical about it. This is a campaign play.