3 ms·
The form of your comment is a continuation of the censorship trend he is referring to. Rather than engage his writing and journalistic perspective by providing
by elif 6y ago
The form of your comment is a continuation of the censorship trend he is referring to.
Rather than engage his writing and journalistic perspective by providing your own, you have pigeonholed and dismissed it outright without even reading it.
And rather than back up your own argument, you have chosen to attack his character as your support.
- xracy 6y ago1. I don't think you understand the word "censorship". OP of the comment doesn't have the power for it, and Greenwald certainly wasn't censored if everyone is able to read his opinions spearately 2. You don't know that the person didn't read it. That's an unprovable assumption. 3. OP's explaining why the article isn't worth running. This really doesn't amount to a real character attack unless you're new to the internet...