3 ms·
> "buying journalism one journalist at a time is too expensive" Yes and no. It is if you want to get all of your daily news that way. But if it's an area you c
by groby_b 6y ago
> "buying journalism one journalist at a time is too expensive"
Yes and no. It is if you want to get all of your daily news that way. But if it's an area you care about and you're somewhat affluent, it's well worth the money. (I'd think a good chunk of HN e.g. has a subscription to Stratechery)
It's a workable strategy for a few extremely good journalists. But there are a lot of issues with it.
Societally, this is problematic in that it makes decent reporting a luxury good. Long-term, this is a problem because there's no institution where junior journalists can learn the trade. In terms of information, it's a problem because there'll likely be no way to get a wider overview of world news in that way.
- spaceribs 6y agoSee: the entire art world.
- outsomnia 6y agoYou can sell on a piece of art though. Here are licensing the right to consume text without any ownership or ability to redistribute. It's more akin to Netflix. And people are already complaining about having to pay too many aggregators, paying per TV episode is completely out of the question as the way forward.