3 ms·
The hypocrisy on both sides of this debate shows how disgustingly Machiavellian American Politics has become. The ends always justify the means now; no consist
by nostromo 6y ago
The hypocrisy on both sides of this debate shows how disgustingly Machiavellian American Politics has become. The ends always justify the means now; no consistency of ideology is required.
A party that hates regulating business suddenly sees the light when powerful businesses start removing them from the public square.
A party that pretends to be for free speech and free journalism suddenly has a change of heart when it benefits them going into an election.
A party that purports to stand up to big business suddenly supports the largest megacorps in the history of man because their interests are temporarily aligned.
A party that thought Citizens United was terrible because it gave the rights of citizens to corporations suddenly cares very deeply about Twitter/Facebook/Google/Apple's freedom of expression when used to eliminate critical voices on their platforms.
A party gets rid of the filibuster for judge nominations and then gets mad that they can't filibuster the other party's judge nominations -- or a party deciding it's suddenly ok to seat judges during an election.
Both parties are about power. Neither party has any remaining principles.
- zo1 6y agoVery good point! I'd like to add that potentially the reason why these institutions (parties) act that way is because, we as people that form part of them, also don't have or adhere to any strict principles. Edit: Grammar.
- exolymph 6y agoTwas ever thus. People believe whatever is most advantageous for them to believe.
- watwut 6y agoBoth parties are comprised of huge amount of people with much different opinions. If you want ideological consistency, you will have to destroy two party system first. I am not saying it would be bad thing. Also, I don't think ideological consistency the way you define it would even be good thing. Standing up to corporations does not mean corporation is wrong in each case. One also need to severly mischaracterize objections to citizen united in order to make it incompatible with twitters right to censor.