3 ms·
The draft is weak. It completely avoids explaining why several experts conclude it’s disinformation. Instead, it uses a very complicated set of coincidences wit
by hluska 6y ago
The draft is weak. It completely avoids explaining why several experts conclude it’s disinformation. Instead, it uses a very complicated set of coincidences with only one actual fact - Biden had something to do with getting one prosecutor replaced.
That’s flimsy journalism. Expecting better out of a journalist is far from voluntary ignorance.
- vokep 6y agoIs there anywhere I can find a clear explanation of expert's reasoning to conclude it's disinformation? It seems like the information is really up in the air, it will take time to determine what conclusions from it are legitimate and false. The information itself is quite clearly real, at least, I haven't seen any specific piece of information in regards to this claimed as false, just the whole subject referred to as "disinformation".
- monetus 6y agoI heard sam seder break what he knew down pretty well a few days ago but I am having trouble finding the clip.
- hluska 6y agoHere is a letter signed by 50 former high ranking intelligence officials - it's easy to absorb and if you're interested, it will give you plenty of threads to Google. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000 https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9...