>Investors that don't work for wages don't strike me as a likely group to develop growing levels of resentment. That's correct, but is not what is implied by "

>Investors that don't work for wages don't strike me as a likely group to develop growing levels of resentment. That's correct, but is not what is implied by "The source of unrest is resentment among people that don't think they're getting their fair share". Those investors are analogous to the knights & nobles of the 1200s, who most likely will gladly support the existing system because they benefit greatly from it. What is implied is that people _who train to be investors but cannot find work investing_ will be more likely to develop growing levels of resentment. They are in the same boat as the extra 25000 lawyers per year.