3 ms·

You're right, the Mueller report is what makes it true: https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theo

by Nacdor 6y ago

You're right, the Mueller report is what makes it true: https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/ https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-m... > Mueller, in addition to concluding that evidence was insufficient to charge any American with crimes relating to Russian election interference, also stated emphatically in numerous instances that there was no evidence – not merely that there was insufficient evidence to obtain a criminal conviction – that key prongs of this three-year-old conspiracy theory actually happened. As Mueller himself put it: “in some instances, the report points out the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event.” $35 million wasted on an investigation that started with a FISA warrant based on a phony report (Steele Dossier) commissioned by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

gkoberger 6y ago
The Steele Dossier was not commissioned by Clinton. The investigation was because of Carter Page, not the dossier. Mueller's scope of investigation was very narrow, was ended by Barr prematurely, and was filtered through Barr. Donald Trump definitely solicited Russian interference in the election. His family met with Russians in Trump Tower. Right after the meeting, Trump said to expect dirt on Clinton. Soon after that, he looked into a camera and told Putin to hack Clinton. Hours later, Clinton was hacked by Russians for the first time. Mueller may not have found a smoking gun from a legal perspective, but let's not act like this is a Democratic hoax. Trump was caught doing it again a few months later, with Ukraine, and was impeached for it.