4 ms·
Here's an audio source[1] for the people downvoting this. [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8
by JeremyHoward 6y ago
Here's an audio source[1] for the people downvoting this.
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8
- ivalm 6y agoAh yes, a literal 7 second fakeable audio involving a non-Biden without any context.
- googthrowaway42 6y ago> "It's fake" This is a cult-like millenarianist reaction.
- youtube-dl2 6y agoIt's better than the boomers cult-like lack of critical thought.
- DyslexicAtheist 6y ago"evidence" presented by Tucker Carlosn on Fox. you've already lost me there.
- nailer 6y agoThat's not how truth works. If something is not correct, state why it is not correct. You may not like Fox or The Guardian or the NYT or Daily Wire or Vox but that doesn't affect whether their content is true.
- DyslexicAtheist 6y agoI will not engage with arguments presented by Tucker Carlson for the same reason that I wouldn't engage when Ted Kaczinsky presents the merits of "The Industrial Society and it's Future". Maybe it's my fault as a European that these people to me seem absolutely insane. (literally and in some cases even criminally insane)
- nailer 6y agoAlso European, but again: that's not how truth works.
- zbyte64 6y agoAhh yes, Tucker Carlson "I have the evidence but it was lost in the mail" totally wouldn't allow another to present a one-sided account without challenge and would certainly present evidence in context.
- scottlocklin 6y agoFWIIW it appears that UPS located the mail.
- googthrowaway42 6y agoTucker Carlson has said they made copies anyway.
- brendoelfrendo 6y agoI'm not under any obligation to wait for the broken clock to be right twice a day when there are plenty of other, perfectly good clocks. Tucker Carlson's journalistic integrity and reputation absolutely play a role in my judgement of the information he reports.
- jeegsy 6y agoYou are wasting your time. People have arrived at the conclusion and are just trying to reverse engineer a "rational" reason for the conclusion. I mean it shouldn't be that hard to convince ppl what in Biden's long career and the millions resulting from it aren't tied up in some corrupt or at the very least shady activity.
- starkd 6y agoTrue. But it still needs to be said.