4 ms·

This is wrong. The WSJ did report as The Editorial Board (means all of them). https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-bidens-and-tony-bobulinski-11603927190 https://w

• ojnabieoot 6y ago
  You are wrong, the actual op-ed that “reported” the allegations was “written” by Strassel a week before the editorial you linked to: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-biden-family-legacy-11603409528 https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-biden-family-legacy-1160340... Edit: to clarify, the editorial you linked seems to be a real editorial that said “these questions need to be investigated” - the op-Ed I linked to presented itself as divulging new information. In 99.9999999% of cases this would be an odd use of an op-ed, but it appears to have been the only option since the reporters refused. It is also worth noting that WSJ has a unique and well-known dichotomy between “brilliant, hard-hitting reporting” and “unbelievably hackish Joe-Rogan-level opinions.”
  • AaronFriel 6y ago
    Another Wall Street Journal article, this time from the news desk, found no link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/hunter-bidens-ex-business-partner-alleges-father-knew-about-venture-11603421247 https://www.wsj.com/articles/hunter-bidens-ex-business-partn...