The idea that the Intercept has a blanket prohibition on criticism of Joe Biden is transparently ridiculous. https://theintercept.com/2020/09/02/biden-foreign-

The idea that the Intercept has a blanket prohibition on criticism of Joe Biden is transparently ridiculous. https://theintercept.com/2020/09/02/biden-foreign-policy-war/ https://theintercept.com/2020/09/02/biden-foreign-policy-war... https://theintercept.com/2020/09/01/biden-economic-policy-us-economy/ https://theintercept.com/2020/09/01/biden-economic-policy-us... https://theintercept.com/2020/08/13/biden-latino-deportation-moratorium-platform/ https://theintercept.com/2020/08/13/biden-latino-deportation... https://theintercept.com/2020/08/07/joe-biden-climate-policy-advisers/ https://theintercept.com/2020/08/07/joe-biden-climate-policy... What Glenn’s whiny rant leaves out is that it wasn’t just the Intercept that refused to run the Hunter/Ukraine/China BS: reporters at the NY Post and Wall Street Journal both refused to put their names on the story. The NY Post had to use a producer on Tucker Carlson’s show, while the WSJ ran the story as an op-ed since the reporters again refused to tarnish their reputation (they also ran a story from the actual reporters rebutting the allegations) Editorial judgment and criticism is part of free speech. It is not just about broadcasting the president’s re-election propaganda as loudly as you can. And the idea that Glenn Greenwald can be trusted rests entirely on his 2007-2015 work, and ignores how disgraceful, craven, and just plain pathetic he became in 2016. Anyone who appears on Tucker Carlson’s show simply should not be trusted.