5 ms·
One could simply ask the people in the email if they are real. "Impossible to verify" is just lazy excuse-making. This is basic journalism.
by pwned1 6y ago
One could simply ask the people in the email if they are real. "Impossible to verify" is just lazy excuse-making.
This is basic journalism.
- jasonwatkinspdx 6y agoThat's not how basic fact checking works. You don't just single source a story on the basis of that sources "trust me."
- remarkEon 6y agoThat's literally been the last 4 years of journalism surrounding this administration. Not only that, but the sources almost never are actually named.
- rat87 6y agoIt hasn't but people like to pretend it has Good journalists tend to not rely on on one anonymous source, they check with other sources and available evidence. The thing is this white house is extremely dishonest and corrupt and leaks like a seive hence a lot of anonymous sources
- ivalm 6y agoSo there is one shady person who says he is real but who can’t prove anything and other people in the emails deny them. Of course if the emails are fake then the forgers would include a confederate as one of the people in the chain.
- nwienert 6y agoIs the shady person you’re referring to Tony Bobulinski? If so, he is the documented primary business partner in the suspected deals who has provided verified emails, he’s a US citizen with a history of military service who put his real name on the line. It doesn’t get less shady than that. Unless you’re referring to someone else.
- rebelos 6y agoThis is among the most naive comments in this thread. You clearly know very little about the about the history of military personnel, their credibility, and their political affiliations. You should look into Seal Team Six as an example. Some of them have turned out to be rabid crackpots. Being associated with the military confers absolutely zero marginal credibility over any other citizen. If anything, it's the opposite since there's a known conservative bias in military and law enforcement - dovish liberalism threatens their values and their power.
- starkd 6y agoBobulinski has audio recording talking to one of Biden family partners saying "if you go public with this story, you will bury us all".
- JeremyHoward 6y agoHere's an audio source[1] for the people downvoting this. [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxE2nlDjYt8
- ivalm 6y agoAh yes, a literal 7 second fakeable audio involving a non-Biden without any context.
- googthrowaway42 6y ago> "It's fake" This is a cult-like millenarianist reaction.
- youtube-dl2 6y agoIt's better than the boomers cult-like lack of critical thought.
- DyslexicAtheist 6y ago"evidence" presented by Tucker Carlosn on Fox. you've already lost me there.
- nailer 6y agoThat's not how truth works. If something is not correct, state why it is not correct. You may not like Fox or The Guardian or the NYT or Daily Wire or Vox but that doesn't affect whether their content is true.
- 6y ago
- JeremyHoward 6y ago> and other people in the emails deny them. No they haven't. Neither Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, James Gilliar or Rob Walker, have denied that the emails and text messages sent to Tony Bobulinski are real.