3 ms·
I can get that a significant part of it is just "static HTML," what I don't quite get is what makes it different than just static site generation. I guess that
by zerocrates 6y ago
I can get that a significant part of it is just "static HTML," what I don't quite get is what makes it different than just static site generation. I guess that would be the "A" part...
- whalesalad 6y agoYea... SPA == same thing imho.
- detaro 6y agoMarketing pretty much. Some vague cloud of "uses serverless to generate", "pushes static files to a CDN through an API", but if you drill down none of that is key to it. I.e. you'll find advocates state that if a site uses a static site generator or Netlify it's JAMStack.
- madeofpalk 6y agono, that's it. jamstack - static site generator, but javascript
- Vinnl 6y agoIt mostly concerns how often content is updated. Real-time: dynamically generated on the server-side. (e.g. injecting the current user's username) Occasionally: Jamstack (e.g. rebuilding a static site every time a contributors adds a blog post via the CMS) Rarely: manual updates (e.g. manually deploying a new version of a small-town restaurant's website when the menu changes)