2 ms·
It's important to remember that while technically there is a chronologically first person to discover X for all X, that doesn't imply that that person is the on
by munificent 6y ago
It's important to remember that while technically there is a chronologically first person to discover X for all X, that doesn't imply that that person is the only person to discover X. For sufficiently obvious X, there are likely to be many independent discoverers and highlighting the chronologically first one heaps praise somewhat arbitrarily on one of them.
- chowned 6y ago"History isn't perfect" is not a good reason to avoid doing history. Historians are all well aware of these facts.