I think the outrage around the Sacklers and the money they kept from sales of opioids is justified. That said, I think you're arguing that if Purdue Pharma wer

I think the outrage around the Sacklers and the money they kept from sales of opioids is justified. That said, I think you're arguing that if Purdue Pharma were to continue pushing opioids and the Sacklers continued to profit handsomely, that would be equivalent to them stopping now? Stopping them now isn't any sort of win?