8 ms·

I resepectfully disagree. My company has two PSGI Dancer apps running mission critical elements. They're "new" but they're absolutely production ready. Plack

I resepectfully disagree. My company has two PSGI Dancer apps running mission critical elements. They're "new" but they're absolutely production ready. Plack/PSGI has been embraced by almost everyone. I'm REALLY looking forward to playing with DotCloud. Plack/PSGI is not "cutting edge". It's the way to do it now, not tomorrow. You do Miyagawa a disservice implying he's pumping his own code.

nmcfarl 15y ago
Likewise my company is 100% PSGI for the last year+, we're a mix of a good number of Catalyst and Dancer apps. We've had absolutely 0 problems here. PSGI stable, sane and the way you want to be doing things.
- bbbbbbbbb 15y ago
  As both of you have a good experience of Plack/PSGI, could you sum up the benefit you got from using it?
  - askbjoernhansen 15y ago
    If your app (or your framework) runs on Plack/PSGI you have a wide choice of server implementations. It will work under mod_perl, FastCGI and numerous other server environments. Indeed if you write an app to run on DotCloud; you can also run the same app on your laptop, Phenona, any other server -- etc etc. As someone else said (more politely), you'd have to be nuts to do an HTTP app now and not take advantage of it.
bbbbbbbbb 15y ago
>Plack/PSGI has been embraced by almost everyone. In your company or in general? Because if it's in general, I would be more than happy to see where you get your stats. > You do Miyagawa a disservice implying he's pumping his own code. Well, I do think that a not even 2yo spec,a set of modules that are 6~18 months old pushed on a cloud service like that with no back up plan for more "traditional" systems is a way to push its own system. we can agree to disagree on that. which percentage of providers offer plack with nginx nowadays compared to Apache with FactCGI?

8 ms·

I resepectfully disagree. My company has two PSGI Dancer apps running mission critical elements. They're "new" but they're absolutely production ready. Plack

by whiskeyjack 15y ago

nmcfarl 15y ago
Likewise my company is 100% PSGI for the last year+, we're a mix of a good number of Catalyst and Dancer apps. We've had absolutely 0 problems here. PSGI stable, sane and the way you want to be doing things.
- bbbbbbbbb 15y ago
  As both of you have a good experience of Plack/PSGI, could you sum up the benefit you got from using it?
  - askbjoernhansen 15y ago
    If your app (or your framework) runs on Plack/PSGI you have a wide choice of server implementations. It will work under mod_perl, FastCGI and numerous other server environments. Indeed if you write an app to run on DotCloud; you can also run the same app on your laptop, Phenona, any other server -- etc etc. As someone else said (more politely), you'd have to be nuts to do an HTTP app now and not take advantage of it.
bbbbbbbbb 15y ago
>Plack/PSGI has been embraced by almost everyone. In your company or in general? Because if it's in general, I would be more than happy to see where you get your stats. > You do Miyagawa a disservice implying he's pumping his own code. Well, I do think that a not even 2yo spec,a set of modules that are 6~18 months old pushed on a cloud service like that with no back up plan for more "traditional" systems is a way to push its own system. we can agree to disagree on that. which percentage of providers offer plack with nginx nowadays compared to Apache with FactCGI?