I'm not a lawyer, but that's what confuses me. Section 230 doesn't need to be changed; twitter violated it quite obviously. Blocking the NYPost article was not

I'm not a lawyer, but that's what confuses me. Section 230 doesn't need to be changed; twitter violated it quite obviously. Blocking the NYPost article was not in good faith. It wasn't obscene. It was harassing or violent. Twitter should by this definition lose their Section 230 protections. Good luck operating Twitter without those protections.